I'm in an organization with a couple of interesting people. One told us that she's a witch. Sure enough, she sports pentagram earrings. Seams like a pretty reasonable person otherwise, someone who'd make a decent neighbor, wouldn't let her dog leave piles in your yard or borrow your lawnmower and not give it back.
Another person in this organization calls herself a "healer." She had some other word in front of it, sounded like Leika or Leyka or something like that. Some Indian thing, I guess, though she can't be much of a healer because she recently had brain surgery to have something removed. I'd guess it to be analogous to a medicine man or shaman or something equally foolish. When she announced this, I turned to the guy beside me, who happens to be a baptist minister, and rolled my eyes. He put his hand on my arm and said, "Oh, that's ok."
Well, I don't know what that is, precisely, so I don't know if it's ok. But since he said it was, I gave her the benefit of the doubt. Back when I was a futurist, I wouldn't have wanted to be around these people. I wouldn't have feared them or anything, but I wouldn't want to associate with them.
But now that I'm a preterist, that puts a different spin on things. If the devil is toast, so to speak, fondue, or whatever, then these individuals could hardly be worshiping him or consorting with him, intentionally or otherwise, even of they thought they were. They'd be more comical or pitiful than evil, right? So am I right that we needn't avoid business dealings with them? It seems to me that, with the devil resembling a s'more, someone who claims to be a wiccan is no more evil than someone who worships Quetzlcoatal or Barney Rubble, or someone equally fictitious. Would you agree?
Another person in this organization calls herself a "healer." She had some other word in front of it, sounded like Leika or Leyka or something like that. Some Indian thing, I guess, though she can't be much of a healer because she recently had brain surgery to have something removed. I'd guess it to be analogous to a medicine man or shaman or something equally foolish. When she announced this, I turned to the guy beside me, who happens to be a baptist minister, and rolled my eyes. He put his hand on my arm and said, "Oh, that's ok."
Well, I don't know what that is, precisely, so I don't know if it's ok. But since he said it was, I gave her the benefit of the doubt. Back when I was a futurist, I wouldn't have wanted to be around these people. I wouldn't have feared them or anything, but I wouldn't want to associate with them.
But now that I'm a preterist, that puts a different spin on things. If the devil is toast, so to speak, fondue, or whatever, then these individuals could hardly be worshiping him or consorting with him, intentionally or otherwise, even of they thought they were. They'd be more comical or pitiful than evil, right? So am I right that we needn't avoid business dealings with them? It seems to me that, with the devil resembling a s'more, someone who claims to be a wiccan is no more evil than someone who worships Quetzlcoatal or Barney Rubble, or someone equally fictitious. Would you agree?